🥝GuideKiwi
Free Guide

Free Guide to Constitutional Amendment Process

How a Constitutional Amendment Gets Proposed The Constitution of the United States includes a built-in way to change itself through amendments. There are two...

How a Constitutional Amendment Gets Proposed

The Constitution of the United States includes a built-in way to change itself through amendments. There are two main methods to propose a constitutional amendment, and understanding these methods shows how the founding document remains flexible while still being difficult to alter.

The first method involves Congress. For an amendment to be proposed through Congress, it must receive approval from two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This means that in the House, at least 290 votes out of 435 representatives must support the amendment. In the Senate, at least 67 votes out of 100 senators must support it. This high threshold reflects the idea that constitutional changes should have broad support across the legislative branch. Throughout American history, Congress has proposed 33 amendments in this manner, which led to 27 amendments becoming part of the Constitution.

The second method is called a constitutional convention, though it has never actually been used. This method allows states themselves to initiate the amendment process. If two-thirds of the state legislatures—that is, 34 out of 50 states—request a constitutional convention, Congress must call one. At this convention, delegates from all states would gather to propose amendments. The convention would operate under specific rules about which topics it can address, depending on what the states requested.

Both methods require the same next step: ratification by the states. Proposed amendments do not automatically become part of the Constitution. Instead, they move to the states for consideration. This separation between proposal and ratification ensures that amendments reflect not just federal lawmakers' views but also the views of the states themselves.

Practical takeaway: Congress proposes amendments through a two-thirds vote in both chambers. States can theoretically call a constitutional convention if 34 state legislatures petition Congress, though this has never occurred. Both paths lead to the same ratification process.

Understanding the Ratification Process

After Congress or a constitutional convention proposes an amendment, it moves to the ratification phase. Ratification is the process by which states officially approve or reject a proposed amendment. For an amendment to become part of the Constitution, it must be ratified by three-fourths of the states. Currently, this means 38 out of 50 states must vote to approve the amendment.

Each state has two ways to ratify an amendment. The first method involves the state legislature. In most cases, the state's elected representatives in its state legislature hold a vote on the proposed amendment. If the legislature votes to ratify, the state is counted as having approved the amendment. The second method involves a ratification convention. A state can hold a special convention where delegates gather specifically to vote on the amendment. This method has been used only a handful of times in American history, most notably when states ratified the 21st Amendment, which repealed prohibition.

The timeline for ratification varies. Some amendments have been ratified quickly. The 26th Amendment, which lowered the voting age to 18, was ratified in just over three months in 1971. Other amendments have taken much longer. The 22nd Amendment, which limits presidents to two terms, was proposed in 1947 but not ratified until 1951. One amendment, the 27th Amendment concerning congressional pay raises, was proposed in 1789 but not ratified until 1992—over 200 years later. There is no legal time limit for ratification, though Congress can set one when it proposes an amendment.

Once 38 states have ratified an amendment, it becomes part of the Constitution automatically. The ratifying states do not need to be consecutive or follow any particular geographic pattern. An amendment simply needs to reach the three-fourths threshold to take effect.

Practical takeaway: States ratify amendments through their legislatures or special conventions. An amendment becomes part of the Constitution once 38 states ratify it. There is no standard time limit for the ratification process.

Historical Examples of Successful Amendments

Looking at real amendments provides concrete examples of how the process works in practice. The 19th Amendment, which granted women the right to vote, was proposed by Congress on June 4, 1919, and ratified on August 18, 1920. This amendment required 36 states to ratify it (the threshold at that time with 48 states). The ratification fight was intense, with some states voting no and others voting yes. Tennessee was the final state needed, and its legislature voted to ratify by just one vote. Newspapers at the time reported on this close vote, showing how significant each state's decision was to the amendment's fate.

The 26th Amendment, passed during the Vietnam War, provides another instructive example. Young Americans argued that if 18-year-olds could be drafted into military service, they should be able to vote. Congress proposed this amendment on March 23, 1971, and it was ratified on July 1, 1971. This rapid ratification—in just 100 days—showed that when there is broad public support and political momentum, states can move quickly. The amendment lowered the voting age from 21 to 18, immediately changing election participation across the country.

The 22nd Amendment illustrates a different scenario: slower ratification driven by party politics. Proposed in 1947, this amendment limited presidents to two terms. Democrats, still influenced by Franklin D. Roosevelt's four-term presidency, initially opposed it. Republicans, frustrated by Democratic control of the presidency, supported it. Ratification took four years because states had to overcome these political divisions. By 1951, when it was finally ratified, the political climate had shifted enough to allow it to pass.

The 16th Amendment shows how amendments can reverse previous court decisions. In 1895, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress could not levy an income tax. This limited the federal government's ability to raise money. Congress proposed the 16th Amendment in 1909, and states ratified it in 1913. This amendment specifically allowed Congress to collect income taxes without apportioning the tax among states based on population. Today, income tax is the federal government's largest revenue source.

Practical takeaway: Amendments have been ratified at different speeds depending on political support and public opinion. Some amendments reverse court decisions or respond to pressing social issues. Historical examples show that state-by-state ratification creates a genuine deliberative process.

Why Amendments Are Rare and Difficult to Pass

Only 27 amendments have been added to the Constitution in over 230 years of American history. This low number is intentional. The framers of the Constitution wanted to prevent hasty changes while still allowing for necessary reforms. The two-thirds voting requirement in Congress and the three-fourths ratification requirement among states make amendments genuinely difficult to achieve.

Consider the math. For an amendment to pass Congress, it needs support from two-thirds of both chambers. In a closely divided Congress, this is extremely challenging. For instance, if one major political party opposes an amendment, that party would need to contribute enough votes to reach the two-thirds threshold. Partisan disagreement has blocked many proposed amendments from even leaving Congress. Hundreds of amendments have been proposed over the years, but only 33 have made it to the states for ratification.

The ratification requirement adds another layer of difficulty. An amendment needs approval from 38 out of 50 states. This means that just 13 states voting against an amendment can block it, even if all others support it. This gives smaller states significant power in the amendment process. A state can refuse to ratify for many reasons: local political opposition, concerns about federal power, economic interests, or disagreement with the amendment's substance. Once ratified by enough states to pass, an amendment cannot be "un-ratified" by other states.

Some proposed amendments have come close but failed. In 1978, Congress proposed a constitutional amendment to grant Washington, D.C., representation in Congress equal to that of the states. The amendment passed Congress with the required two-thirds majority and was sent to the states. However, only 16 states ratified it—far short of the 38 needed. The amendment died. In the 1980s, a proposal to balance the federal budget passed Congress twice but fell short in state ratification both times.

The difficulty of amendment is sometimes seen as a feature, not a flaw. It means that temporary political movements cannot easily rewrite the fundamental law. It requires amendments to have sustained, broad support across diverse regions and populations. This has preserved the Constitution's stability while allowing for genuine evolution over time.

Practical takeaway: Constitutional amendments are rare

🥝

More guides on the way

Browse our full collection of free guides on topics that matter.

Browse All Guides →